Introduction
It is as a 
result of an obvious lacuna in worthy, responsible leadership in many 
economies of the world that these questions were thrown up not long ago:
 "What
 has happened to leadership? Have all the great leaders gone from the 
world scene?" The search for true, value based leadership is not limited
 to the global arena, but also relevant in the task of socio-political, 
cultural, educational, and moral transformation of developing economies 
such as Ghana.
However, 
why does a true leader need to demonstrate values in leadership? Values 
are regarded as esteemed qualities which are intrinsically desirable. 
That is why experts in the humanities have described values as "the 
especial essence of who we are as human beings." Such demonstrable and 
authentic values on which the Ghanaian society should be built upon 
include transparency, patriotism, personal integrity, fear of God, 
courage, transformational leadership, accountability, vision, 
creativity, knowledge, character and passion.
Leadership
 also, has been described as a form of service. Thus, In order to lead 
effectively, a leader should be
 willing to meet the essential needs of the individuals in the team or 
group. London's Sunday Times published an article with the title, 
"Whatever Happened to Real Leaders" the time it noticed the perceptible 
inadequacy in the leadership of some economies in Europe. The fact not 
only applies in the Western world where the people combat leadership 
problems of recent, it is also applicable to the Ghanaian situation, as 
the reputed most populous Black nation (in terms of the production of cocoa, gold and a strong football team) who needs values-based, 
visionary leadership. It is a powerful, well-timed plea for the 
emergence of a right kind of leadership that can deliver Ghanaians from 
the grip of its many socio-economic problems resulting from poor 
governance.
Nature of leadership in Ghana
While
 underscoring the need for anyone entrusted with the sacrosanct mandate 
of leadership in any human community, Walter Lippmann, a late American 
newspaper commentator, in his
 syndicated column "Today and Tomorrow", attempted another description 
of leaders as "the custodians of a nation's ideals, of the beliefs it 
cherishes, of its permanent hopes, and of the faith which makes a nation
 out of a mere aggregation of individuals." According to Lippmann, the 
term literally, refers to a keeper, a guardian or a caretaker, as it is a
 proactive word which implies action on the part of the bearer. He is 
the custodians of the people's mandate who simply holds such in trust 
and on behalf of others. In other words, custodianship does not imply 
behaviour motivated out of self-interest, which leads to the unbecoming 
development which Ghana daily witnesses in various aspects of their 
national life.
Today, it 
is no longer news in the country to see the mass media of communication 
inundated with scandalous and disturbing stories of reckless inflation 
of contract sums, disappearance of phoney contractors after collecting 
mobilisation
 funds, or oftentimes, all of the contract sum; blind looting of 
treasuries with impunity, brigandage, culture of wastage, outright lack 
of vision on the part the leadership, endless dashed hopes, and lack of 
creativity in statecraft, and instances of shoddy cum white elephant 
projects with no material relevance to the aspirations of the populace.
It
 is simply overwhelming these days, as Ghanaians helplessly, continue to
 hear or read about horrifying tales of financial malfeasance, under 
various guises, and obvious looting of the treasury being reported in 
the media. This is purportedly being committed by both appointed and 
elected leaders in active connivance with the largely inefficient civil 
servants, shameless and forceful collection of toll from transporters or
 motorists by men and officers of the Ghana Police Service on the 
nation's roads; absolute diversions of statutory allocations originally 
budgeted for developmental projects and
 programmes, into private accounts for personal use by corrupt leaders.
Moreover,
 a former US Ambassador to Ghana during the Kuffuor administration, at a
 seminar in Granada recently, made a comparative analysis of the 
sustained purposeless leadership afflicting Ghana with what is 
obtainable in the United States (US) in connection with values-based 
leadership. Carrington, specifically, mentioned the progressive strides 
the US has been recording over time to the extent that "racism and 
nepotism" were fast disappearing in America, thereby paving way for an 
African-American (obviously referring to Barack Obama) to win the 
support of the majority of the Americans to occupy the White House, the 
official seat of US Government in Washington D.C. According to him, 
instead of making distinct progress, the loss of a value system in Ghana
 has made corruption, concept of "indigeneship", vandalism and political
 thuggery to remain prominent in the country's
 body politic.
It is not 
unexpected to discern why some wonder aloud, if responsibility, 
accountability and sense of integrity could ever be restored in the 
political dictionary of the current crop of leaders. Perhaps, such 
individuals and groups who frantically, desire meaningful change in the 
socio-political life of the country think so against the backdrop of 
apparent purposeful, focused leadership that characterised the era of 
Ghana's founding fathers as late Dr Kwame Nkrumah,Nana Yaa Asantewaa, 
the Big Six, our fomer Presidents and their ministers whose work were 
really credible and others who sacrificed a lot to ensure the well-being 
of the masses. With their own share of challenges peculiar to the 
management of human affairs, till this day, those erstwhile leaders are 
fondly remembered for good as a result of their strength of character, 
discipline, loyalty, and patriotism.
Indeed,
 with nostalgia, one cannot but be amazed at the
 depth of passion exemplified in the communication of these past 
Ghanaian leaders as regards the pursuit of their economic programmes for
 the welfare of the people. It is quite edifying for any discerning 
Ghanaian, especially the young ones, to listen and watch to the 
programme which I titled: "Memories of Our Heroes", a production of GTV 
News Directorate (especially some weeks before the celebration of the annual independence), which gives us a re-play of some of the events Ghana 
underwent before the independece and the contributions of our legends. 
One believes reliving and reflecting on memorable experiences of such 
great Ghanaians would add much impetus to the ongoing efforts and 
projects such as the so-called Better Ghana Agenda which has 
its own significance to its inventors.
Interestingly, it 
deserves a mention that in our day, there are yet men and women of 
substance who exemplify rare values-based leadership and courage in 
service to humanity in both private and public sectors of Ghana's 
economy.
 Research has shown that Ghanaians such as  Peter Cardinal Turkson, 
Prof. Frimpong Boateng, Mr.Kofi Annan, Archbishop Charles Gabriel Palmer-Buckle, Pastor Mensa Otabil and the many village teachers 
teaching in villages where the government has forgotten even the names, 
and other numerous to mention here fall into this category. Such ones 
are said to have continued to hold their heads high in and outside 
positions of authority despite very widespread corrupting influences 
around them. They are no doubt, shining examples to, particularly the 
younger generation.
However,
 a large number of the population believe that what is obtainable now is
 just a question of corrupt leader's associating himself or herself with
 any of the vicious cliques of ravenous individuals whose stock in trade
 is to hold their fatherland down till eternity, because we virtually 
lack the basic amenities (like electricity, water, LPG and other 
petroleum products, transport and even ICT for our schools and other
 public places) that
 makes life moving.  It is therefore, not unusual to hear the 
mind-boggling term, ‘cabal' which can be equated to a firm (company) 
owned by our politicians, at every turn in socio-political discourses. 
The masses have categorised such dubious leaders as belonging to either 
the oil/filling station cabal, electric power cabal, generators or rice importation 
cabal, political power NDC, NPP, CPP, PPP and PNC cabal, or fertilizer business cabal among other 
amorphous ones. Over the years, these groups are believed to have 
succeeded, just as they, absurdly, continue to work against the 
collective will of the Ghanaian people on all fronts.
Ghanaians
 seeking elective and political offices with nothing to offer the 
generality of the population ought to be discouraged henceforth. Again, 
as custodians of the people's mandate to serve them and manage their 
combined resources for the betterment of the entire society, individuals
 holding leadership positions should know and chart the way forward for
 the led, uphold what is best for all people, even if it may not be in 
his or her own interest to do so. Their custodial role must be 
approached as a temporary role, preserving something greater than the 
self -principles of enduring value in service. This embodies an attitude
 that focuses on the task at hand and not on what a leader may gain from
 the position he or she holds. This will certainly bring about a caring 
and concerned relationship between leaders and followers.
Consequently,
 these seem contrary to what is happening across the land. In many 
arenas in the country today, we see appointed or elected leaders holding
 nothing in trust for those they purport to serve. Instead, it is 
looting galore, as scores of them merely continue to advance their own 
ideals, hopes, and aspirations to keep their followers down and 
frustrated perpetually. Where there is no common vision to be shared and
 actualised, it is often difficult to say whether such
 selfish Ghanaian leaders are serving their people in any meaningful 
way.
Poor reward system 
has been identified as another serious factor, which probably instigates
 many a leader to consciously, greedily appropriate billions of tax 
payers' money to themselves in the name of "allowances", or in many 
instances, some resort to outright pillaging of treasuries, regardless 
of whatever happens to them after leaving office. But then, why 
institutionalised corruption in the nation's system? An unnamed 
foreigner who has lived in Ghana for sometime was quoted as answering 
this poser thus: "Becoming corrupt is almost unavoidable, because 
morality is relaxed in the society (Ghana), and many people struggle for
 survival without assistance from the state."
Mismanagement,
 deceit, and unfettered greed simply remain the undying features of the 
system, just as assumedly vision-oriented economic blueprints, 
development plans meant for implementation
 gather dusts on shelves. Yet, many questions all beg for answers. And, 
concerned Ghanaians have continued to ask rhetorically: Where are our 
leaders leading? To whom can we look for the direction we need in 
respect of the actualisation of the much-touted Ghanaian dream? To many,
 reviving the different sectors of the nation's economy for the benefit 
of the generality of the people appears hopeless.
Effects of valueless leadership
The
 self-serving nature of some leaders has led to more exigent problems in
 the Ghanaian system in recent times. The continued maladministration 
has not only entrenched a culture of corruption, impunity, political 
rascality, mindless looting of treasury, sycophancy, personality cults, 
purposeless leadership, and rampant disillusionment among the Ghanaian 
people awaiting the advent of a new order in the current system.
Bad
 leadership has also instigated all forms of corrupt activities 
prevalent in
 the country now. These, some say, include political, bureaucratic, 
electoral corruption, embezzlement and bribery. Political corruption, 
which takes place at the highest levels of political authority, is a 
‘corruption of greed.' It affects the manner in which decisions are 
made, manipulates and distorts political institutions and rules of 
procedure.
What about the
 direct effect of this cankerworm on the entire system? Corruption 
tarnishes the image of a nation; perhaps, as someone puts it recently, 
"that is why Ghana suffers more than most societies from an appalling 
international image created by its inability to deal with bribery and 
corruption." 
Way forward to a value-based leadership
As
 measures towards moving the nation forward through purposeful, 
values-based leadership, the nation urgently, needs to get its acts 
right, retrace its steps where it has long got it wrong: anyone who
 aspires to lead others, irrespective of which aspect of the nation's 
life should be one who legitimately understands the core essence of 
selfless service in leadership, not individuals who actually don't 
understand anything about leadership, but about how much he or she could
 steal from the commonwealth.
It
 also, should be realised that anyone who aspires to lead Ghanaians 
without possessing such exceptional values and ideals as personal 
integrity, forthrightness, fairness, belief in the eventual success of 
the Ghanaian enterprise, accountability and trustworthiness, is probably
 taking a stroll. The current crop of leaders should learn to lead by 
example and instil hope in the followership for the emergence of a 
better nation.
According 
to George Washington in his inaugural address as a former President of 
the United States, while encouraging fellow American leaders to shun 
lip-services, he was reported to have declared: "... the
 propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that 
disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has 
ordained."
Stressing the 
need for integrity in proper and effective leadership also, John Adair, a
 visiting professor of Leadership Studies at the University of Surrey 
and Exeter in England, once stated: "... I believe that holding firmly 
to sovereign values outside yourself grows a wholeness of personality 
and moral strength of character. The person of integrity will always be 
tested. The first real test comes when the demands of the truth or good 
appears to conflict with your self-interest or prospects. Which do you 
choose?" A food for thought indeed.
Conclusion
Leadership
 qualities combined with positional power magnify the ability of an 
individual to attract the all-important followers. Though a concept, 
some have described it as enlightened
 self-interest that promises to move Ghana forward, people entrusted 
with leadership responsibilities should always learn to pursue such 
interests that align with the nation's developmental goals. As a friend 
would say, "we will all benefit when we do things right."
 
No comments:
Post a Comment